66 Slides522.00 KB


PREFATORY THOUGHTS You are discussing with your attorney a legal problem. You are confident that your version of the facts in the dispute can be proved. You ask the attorney “does my cause has merit? She says “yes.” You ask if you pursue the case will you win? She says: “I cannot predict the future.” You ask “What are my chances? “ She says, “Assuming what you told can be proved” then:

PREFATORY THOUGHTS She says, “assuming the story you have told is correct” then: EXCELLENT

PREFATORY THOUGHTS Assuming a winning case What is the importance of debt collection and the term judgment debtor?

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) describes alternatives to the traditional judicial resolution of disputes Major approaches to dispute resolution Power Rights Interest

ADR suggests a move from a rights approach to an interest based approach in dispute resolution.

ALTERNATIVES TO LITIGATION INCLUDE Arbitration Mediation Negotiation Of less importance Private judging Ombudsperson Summary jury trial Mini-trial

ARBITRATION Disputing parties agree to select a neutral third party (or parties) to hear and decide the dispute. Generally private, historically private. Requirement of (at least) the passive approval of government, as the awards are ultimately enforceable in the courts.

TYPES OF ARBITRATION Voluntary Pre-dispute agreement provides that arbitration will be used to settle disputes arising between the parties. Clause is part of an otherwise enforceable contract. Post -dispute agreement. Agreement entered into after a conflict arises. Involuntary Judicial arbitration - statute requiring parties in certain cases to submit cases to arbitration as a precondition to a lawsuit. It is NON-BINDING.

NATURE OF ARBITRATION (CONTINUED) Federal and state statutes authorize & encourage arbitration Arbitration processes are usually less formal than courts. Power of arbitration based on the agreement of the parties, statutory law, and/or incorporated procedures. Power of arbitration can be lost at any time if both parties agree to handle the dispute in court. If arbitration clause exists but one party refuses to arbitrate the other party can seek a judicial order to compel arbitration.

NATURE OF ARBITRATION Issues to be heard, number of arbitrators, arbitrator power, processes to be used, and timing are alldependent on the arbitration agreement. Arbitration clauses provide the procedural and substantive boundaries of the case. arbitrators clauses are provided from organizations such as AAA

QUALIFICATION AND SELECTION OF ARBITRATORS Agreement of the parties names the arbitrator(s) Use of standard clauses of professional associations. Such as the American Arbitration Association Permanent referee for series of expected or possible disputes Selection from panels Expertise in subject matter of dispute Known in field Reputation for fairness Recommendation by board Trained in hearing processes

WHY SELECT ARBITRATION? Faster from filing to hearing Cheaper Private Less adversarial than litigation More certain resolution

WHY SELECT ARBITRATION? (CONTINUED) PROBLEMS Private. Public is unaware of disputes in which they may have an interest. Potential litigants unaware of case outcome. True consent of parties to arbitration? Not always less expensive? Loss of right to correct errors of law as the right of appeal is very limited.

Arbitrator Qualifications ?

MEDIATION Mediation--A form of negotiation with the most significant attribute being the addition of a skilled third party expert who assists (facilitates) the parties to negotiate their own resolution. Definition: Intervention in a negotiation or a conflict by an acceptable third party with limited or no authoritative decision-making power but who assists the involved parties in voluntarily reaching a mutual acceptable settlement of the issues in dispute (Christopher Moore).

MEDIATION (CONTINUED) Overall concept is simple. Sometimes referred to as the world’s second oldest profession. Exists in some fashion in most world cultures. Two parties in conflict seek a third party to assist them in resolution of that conflict. The third party assists conflicting parties in communicating but does not decide the dispute.

GENERAL NATURE OF AND CONTRAST WITH OTHER METHODS IN THE UNITED STATES Private while litigation is public. Parties remain in control of decision rather than relinquishing control to government or third party. Mediator facilitates agreement instead of imposing a resolution like in litigation or arbitration. Non-adversarial while litigation in U.S. is adversarial.

GENERAL NATURE OF AND CONTRAST WITH OTHER METHODS IN THE UNITED STATES (CONTINUED) Occurrence of mediation suggests progress because it is voluntary. Parties may not agree on resolution but they agree on a method to resolve dispute. Mediation is less formal than other methods.

HOW PROCESS IS SELECTED OR BEGUN Pre-agreement Post-agreement One party seeks mediation and the provider contacts the other party Referrals

PROCESS PROVIDERS Non-profit generalists ADR providers - American Arbitration Association Community mediation centers such as the Sacramento mediation center State mediation providers such as the California center for public dispute resolution or the Iowa Peace Institute Private vendors

CASES MOST APPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION The parties have a stake in resolving the dispute. The parties share motivation for early settlement. The parties are interdependent and must rely on the cooperation of one another to meet their goals or satisfy their interests.

CASES BELIEVED INAPPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION Disputes focused on beliefs. Severe imbalance of power between the parties. Unmanageable behavior on the part of either party

MEDIATORS (CONTINUED) QUALIFICATIONS Experience in dispute resolution including training and by temperament. Person is able to influence and cajole parties as if a group leader without having had the time to develop that level of respect. Area expertise. Understands the underlying nature of the dispute. Listener. Creative problem solver. Neutral

POSITIVE ATTRIBUTES OR MEDIATION Can be initiated early in the process providing opportunity to end conflict early with a reduction in conflict cost, legal fees, and psychological cost of conflict. Good public relations. Studies show that up to 95% of civil lawsuits resolve short of trial. If that is true why not do it early?

NEGATIVE ATTRIBUTES OF MEDIATION (CONTINUED) Might not get a satisfactory result. Does not provide a win. The result generally is some sort of compromise.

Negotiation Private judging Ombudsperson Med Arb Summary jury trial Mini-trial

negotiation Communication for the purpose of persuasion. A process is which disputants communicated their differences to one another through conference, discussion and compromise in an attempt to resolve them.

PRIVATE JUDGING Process authorized in a few states (including California) whereby at the parties request a court can refer a case to a neutral of the parties choosing who will hear and decide the case. Normal rules of pleading, evidence, and discovery apply and the decision can be appealed on the record to the public courts as if it were decided in a public court

Ombudsman A neutral or impartial manager within an organization who may provide informal and confidential assistance to managers and employees in resolving work-related concerns. Office is located outside ordinary line management structures.

Med ARB Neutral is initially authorized to mediate a dispute and if the parties fail to negotiate a resolution is thereafter authorized to decide the dispute or any undecided issues. Abbreviation of terms mediation and arbitration.

SUMMARY JURY TRIAL A non-binding abbreviated trial by mock jurors chosen from an actual or simulated the jury pool. A judge or magistrate may preside. Principals with authority to settle the case attend. A resulting advisory jury verdict is intended to provide the starting point for settlement negotiations.

MINI-TRIAL A private, voluntary, informal form of dispute resolution in which attorneys for each disputant make a brief presentation of his or her best case before officials for each side who have authority to settle. Usually, a neutral, third party advisor is present at the hearing. Following the attorneys' presentations, the principals attempt to settle the dispute. The neutral third party may be asked to render a non‑binding advisory opinion regarding the dispute outcome if it were litigated.

THE COURTS Authorized and funded by government to provide a neutral forum for the resolution of disputes between people and organizations

TYPES OF COURTS TRIAL COURTS Presentation of evidence Determination of applicable law Application of decided facts to applicable law

TYPES OF COURTS Appellate Courts Review of trial court record to ensure proper application of the law Acceptance of facts offered in trial court No evidence presented no jury present California Supreme Court

TYPES OF COURTS TRIAL – ROLE OF JUDGE AND JURY Jury finder of fact. Judge determiner of law and instructions to jury APPELLATE – ROLE OF JUDGES Appellate Terms to know Judicial review, brief, oral arguments, majority opinion, dissenting opinion, reversible error, reversal, remand, affirm, modify

The Federal Court System United States Supreme Court (Highest Appeals Court) Three judges hear each case, brought up from the District Courts. U.S. Courts of Appeals (12 Circuits) Lower Appeals Courts Nine Justices; appointed for life; may refuse to hear a case; final authority U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Hears appeals from specialized trial courts. Click on any box below for a definition of the jurisdiction of that trial court. U.S. District Courts Primary Trial Court U.S. Bankruptcy Courts U.S. Court of International Trade U.S. Tax Courts Trial Courts of Limited (Specific) Jurisdiction Various Federal Agencies U.S. Claims Court U.S. Patent & Trademark Office Trial Courts of Limited (Specific) Jurisdiction

The California Court System 7 justices-Appointed by Governor confirmed by Commission. Lawyer for 10 years 105 Judges. Same methods & qualifications as Supreme Court Elected by County voters for 6 year terms. Vacancies appointed by governor. Lawyer for 10 years Supreme Court Courts of Appeal 6 Districts Serve for 12 year term. Thereafter elected for additional terms. Sit in 3 judge panels Superior Court One Court for each County Alpine County 2 judges Los Angeles County 8 Divisions at over 50 locations 8.5 million cases annually

ADVERSARY NATURE OF US COURTS AND US LEGAL SYSTEM Burden is on the parties to begin the process and to bring information to the attention of court. Essential requirement of a moving party. Court is a neutral arbiter.-Primarily a processing agent. Self-interest of litigants is thought to insure adequacy of information for the finder of fact to use.

ADVERSARY NATURE OF US COURTS AND US LEGAL SYSTEM (CONTINUED) Each party is independently responsible for presenting its case. Competitors (litigants, parties, and advocates) are openly partial and biased for their side. A premium is placed on advocacy skills, being able to articulate ideas clearly and presenting information in both written and oral form, to convince decision-makers of the merits of a cause.

ADVERSARY NATURE OF US COURTS AND US LEGAL SYSTEM (CONTINUED) The counter system is an inquisitorial system. The judge investigates the dispute, questions witnesses and independently seeks out evidence. The attorney’s role is less critical to the administration of justice.

Jurisdiction From Latin Juris and Dico meaning, “I Speak By the Law.” When used in reference to the courts, the term refers to power and authority over a matter

JURISDICTION Subject matter jurisdiction Jurisdiction of the cause Also refers to geographical boundary of an independent government unit

Jurisdiction Parties In rem Defendant resident Personal Subject Matter Quasi in rem Long-arm statute State Federal Concurrent

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Power of the court to hear cases of a general class Determinates Dollar amount pled Criminal action Remedy requested Nature of problem

The Litigation Process

Adversary System-remember The party seeking redress initiates a lawsuit by filing a complaint, petition in equity or some form of motion

Initial Steps Retention of counsel Pleading -- plaintiff 1. Complaint 2. Summons 3. Service of process (obtaining jurisdiction) 4. Reply if necessary Pleading -- defendant 1. Answer 2. Demurrer or motion to dismiss 3. Cross-complaint or Counter-claim

Complaint (simple) States jurisdiction information Recites facts giving rise to a legal claim Requests remedy

A Sample Complaint IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL NO. 9-1047 Cantwell Muckinfuss, PLAINTIFF vs. COMPLAINT Kissy Angel, DEFENDANT Comes now the Plaintiff and for his cause of action against the defendant alleges and states as follows: 1. This action is between plaintiff, who is a resident of the state of California and defendant who is a resident of the state of New York. There

Sample Complaint continued 2. The amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds the sum of 75,000. 3. On September 10th, 2002 plaintiff, Cantwell Muckinfuss, was exercising good driving habits and reasonable care in driving his car through the intersection of Broadway and Pennsylvania Ave in New York City, New York. When defendant, Kissy Angel, negligently drove her vehicle through a red light at the intersection and collided with plaintiff’s vehicle.

Sample Complaint continued 4. As a result of the collision plaintiff suffered severe physical injury, preventing him from working, and causing property damage to his car. He incurred costs including: 85,000 in medical bills, 25,000 in lost wages, and 9,000 in automobile repairs. Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendant for the sum of 119,000 plus interest at the maximum legal rate and the cost of this action. BY [S] ROSIE F. RAGBIT ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 100 MAIN STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK

Mid-Process of Civil Litigation Discovery The process of gathering evidence on the case Purpose of Discovery Educate each party Eliminate surprise Promote settlement What reason for each purpose? What are the negatives if any regarding discovery?

Mid-Process of Civil Litigation Motions Judgment on the Pleadings Motion to Dismiss Summary Judgment Self-explanatory Can be made at any time after initial pleadings. After discovery when there are no essential facts in dispute

Mid-Process of Civil Litigation Discovery Deposition: Questioning of Parties and witnesses under oath Interrogatories: Written questions to apposing party requesting written answers Motion to Produce: Request for documents and things Request for Admission: Request of opposing party to agree on certain facts

Discovery Purposes of Discovery Efficiency: Educate each party Promote settlement Fairness: Eliminate surprise

What is the role of the Judge in the Trial? Rule on matters of law Keep order in the trial Insure a fair trial

What is the role of the Jury in the Trial? Is it possible there will be no jury? How does that change a trial?

Jury Selection VOIR DIRE Challenge for Cause Peremptory Challenges

Jury Decision: BURDEN OF PROOF Moving party and degree of belief Who has burden? Nature of the burden? Preponderance of the evidence Clear and Convincing Beyond a reasonable doubt

Jury Decision: Agreement State 34 states require less than unanimous in civil cases California ¾ or 9 Federal Unanimous verdict usually required

PRESENTATION OF CASE RULES OF EVIDENCE Relevance Hearsay Best evidence TYPES OF EVIDENCE Direct Circumstantial Opinion Expert Presumptions

Trial Motions Directed Verdict: At close of Plaintiff’s case when Plaintiff has presented no credible evidence supporting claim

PROCESS OF A CIVIL DISPUTE THROUGH THE COURTS Verdict & Judgment Post trial 1. Motions A. Directed verdict--before verdict B. Judgment not withstanding the verdict-after verdict C. New trial 2. Appeal. 3. Collection. A. Writ of execution B. Order of examination C. Garnishment

Related Articles

Back to top button